Category

Archives

Identification of a cancer-associated fibroblast classifier for predicting prognosis and therapeutic response in lung squamous cell carcinoma

Reliable prognostic gene signatures for cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) are still lacking, and the underlying genetic principles remain unclear. Therefore, the 2 main aims of our study were to establish a reliable CAFs prognostic gene signature that can be used to stratify patients with LUSC and to identify promising potential targets for more effective and individualized therapies. Clinical information and mRNA expression were accessed of the cancer genome atlas-LUSC cohort (n = 501) and GSE157011 cohort (n = 484). CAFs abundance were quantified by the multi-estimated algorithms. Stromal CAF-related genes were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression method was utilized to identify the most relevant CAFs candidates for predicting prognosis. Chemotherapy sensitivity scores were calculated using the "pRRophetic" package in R software, and the tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion algorithm was employed to evaluate immunotherapy response. Gene set enrichment analysis and the Search Tool for Interaction of Chemicals database were applied to clarify the molecular mechanisms. In this study, we identified 288 hub CAF-related candidate genes by weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Next, 34 potential prognostic CAFs candidate genes were identified by univariate Cox regression in the cancer genome atlas-LUSC cohort. We prioritized the top 8 CAFs prognostic genes (DCBLD1, SLC24A3, ILK, SMAD7, SERPINE1, SNX9, PDGFA, and KLF10) by a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model, and these genes were used to identify low- and high-risk subgroups for unfavorable survival. In silico drug screening identified 6 effective compounds for high-risk CAFs-related LUSC: TAK-715, GW 441756, OSU-03012, MP470, FH535, and KIN001-266. Additionally, search tool for interaction of chemicals database highlighted PI3K-Akt signaling as a potential target pathway for high-risk CAFs-related LUSC. Overall, our findings provide a molecular classifier for high-risk CAFs-related LUSC and suggest that treatment with PI3K-Akt signaling inhibitors could benefit these patients.

 

Comments:

That's an impressive study! It seems you've used a comprehensive approach to identify potential prognostic gene signatures related to cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). The steps you've taken—from quantifying CAF abundance and identifying hub CAF-related candidate genes to using different regression methods for prognostic gene selection—are thorough and promising.

The identification of the top 8 CAFs prognostic genes (DCBLD1, SLC24A3, ILK, SMAD7, SERPINE1, SNX9, PDGFA, and KLF10) using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model is a significant achievement. These genes could serve as a robust molecular classifier for stratifying patients into low- and high-risk groups for unfavorable survival.

The in silico drug screening results are intriguing, suggesting potential compounds like TAK-715, GW 441756, OSU-03012, MP470, FH535, and KIN001-266 as effective treatments for high-risk CAFs-related LUSC. Moreover, highlighting the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway as a potential target for high-risk CAFs-related LUSC and suggesting inhibitors as potential therapies is valuable information for developing more effective and individualized treatments.

Your study's findings could significantly impact personalized therapies and prognosis assessment for LUSC patients with high-risk CAFs. The comprehensive approach you've employed, combining molecular analysis, prognosis prediction, and in silico drug screening, makes this study a significant contribution to the field of cancer research.

Related Products

Cat.No. Product Name Information
S2928 TAK-715 TAK-715 is a p38 MAPK inhibitor for p38α with IC50 of 7.1 nM, 28-fold more selective for p38α over p38β, no inhibition to p38γ/δ, JNK1, ERK1, IKKβ, MEKK1 or TAK1. Phase 2.

Related Targets

p38 MAPK